{"id":2385,"date":"2011-09-06T14:29:56","date_gmt":"2011-09-06T18:29:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/?p=2385"},"modified":"2011-09-06T14:48:21","modified_gmt":"2011-09-06T18:48:21","slug":"the-decline-and-fall-of-the-french-language-huh","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/the-decline-and-fall-of-the-french-language-huh\/","title":{"rendered":"The Decline and Fall of the French Language? Huh?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Darwin110906.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-2397\" title=\"Darwin\" src=\"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/Darwin110906.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"274\" height=\"210\" \/><\/a>Gary Girod piles up false evidence to support a silly and baseless assumption that the French language is on death\u2019s door. To top it all off, he concludes with Darwinian theory of all things&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Julie Barlow and Jean-Benoit Nadeau tear his argument to bits, point by point.<\/p>\n<p>Last week Gary Girod published an article in <em>New Geography<\/em> entitled <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.newgeography.com\/content\/002387-the-decline-and-fall-french-language\" target=\"_blank\">The Decline and Fall of the French language?<\/a> <\/em>This article is so loaded with false information, bogus theories and slanted assumptions that we decided to write a point-by-point rebuttal. (We also invite Mr. Girod to read our book <em><a href=\"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/en\/the-story-of-french\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Story of French<\/a><\/em>, which he will find instructive.)  <!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>1<\/strong>. English speakers are      right to be proud of the global success of their language, but that      success is not coming at the expense of other international languages,      including French. Languages are not a zero-sum game. The progression of      English as a second language does not mean anyone <em>unlearns<\/em> his or her mother tongue.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2<\/strong>. More people now speak      French than any time in history. A conservative estimate is about 220      million people. This number has tripled since World War II and is still      progressing. After English, French is the world\u2019s most international and      globalized language. Only one third of its speakers are native to the      language \u2013 about 80-85 million. All the others learn it at school. In that      respect, there has been no cataclysmic collapse of French. The number of      native speakers is growing at roughly the same rate as English speakers      (we cite British linguist David Graddol on this). In the 15 years that we      researched the topic, estimates of the number of French speakers in the      world have increased from 175 to 220 million.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3<\/strong>. The number of people who      are learning French is impressive in comparison to any language except      English. If you exclude the countries where French is a native language, there      are roughly 110 million people learning French every year. A quarter of      the second-language teachers in the world teach French. We are presently      researching our next book, on Spanish, and can assure you that the      statistics on the teaching of Spanish, while good, pale in comparison to those      of French.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4. <\/strong>Mr. Girod links the      geographic spread of francophones to the supposed decline of French, but his      simplistic conclusion is false. Links between francophone regions have      increased steadily in the last 40 to 50 years through the multiplication      of networks, associations and information media. Examples: Vietnamese      agronomists are helping Senegal improve rice production techniques.      New-Brunswick jurists, who master common-law in the French language, were      involved in the writing of Mauritius\u2019 constitution. Veterinarians from      Algeria follow closely the work of their colleagues of Quebec, who export      their expertise in artificial insemination.<\/p>\n<p>This global networking is partly      the result of the work of an international organization called the <em>Agence universitaire de la Francophonie <\/em>which links 750 institutions of high learning in 80 countries \u2013 the      most represented being France, Canada, Algeria and Vietnam. There are many      hundreds of other associations that network francophones world-wide.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5.<\/strong> Mr. Girod\u2019s theory that      French is declining in Africa flies in the face of facts. The exact      opposite is happening: Kinshasa, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, is      becoming the world\u2019s largest French-speaking city \u2013 ahead of Paris. While      it is true that English (and Mandarin) are making inroads in French-speaking      countries, people who learn these languages do so <em>after <\/em>being educated in French. French is essential for      obtaining everything from a driver\u2019s license to a university degree.<\/p>\n<p>French is so important in Africa that Nigeria has made it a mandatory second      language. In Algeria, after decades of failed attempts to Arabicize the      education system, the government has reintroduced French. (As to \u201cZaire\u201d,      Mr. Girod should take note that it has been called The Democratic Republic      of Congo since 1997). As to the case of Rwanda, it is true that president      Kagame declared English the official language, but this was a political      gesture and it is far from certain that the policy will succeed anymore      than similar policies did in the past in Madagascar or Algeria.<\/p>\n<p><strong>6. <\/strong>In the Far East, specifically      Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, there are twice as many people learning French      as during colonial times. French teaching is making similar progress in      Thailand, despite student protests.<\/p>\n<p><strong>7. <\/strong>In the Middle East,      French universities, colleges and high school are doing very well. Like in      the case of the African elite, it is not because francophone Lebanese <em>learn<\/em> English that they <em>unlearn <\/em>French.<\/p>\n<p><strong>8.<\/strong> In the United States, with      the exception of Spanish, the teaching of <em>all<\/em> languages declined between 1990 and 1995 \u2013 not just French.      Most languages declined more than French, whose numbers have been stable for      over 50 years. In fact, after Spanish, more Americans study French (1.5      million) than the other five languages on the list combined.<\/p>\n<p><strong>9.<\/strong> In Canada, the number of      French speakers is not falling at all. It is true that their proportion      has declined, mostly due to immigration. On the other hand, 325 000      students, or about 10% of English language students in the country, are      enrolled in full French immersion programs. The number of French students      enrolling in English outside of Quebec is <em>not<\/em> rising sharply. In fact, the 632 French schools outside of      Quebec are so popular they have to turn-down many non-Francophone      candidates.<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.<\/strong> There is no debating that European elites are more inclined to learn English than French as a second language, especially in Eastern Europe. Still, more people speak French in Europe today than anytime in its history. Two centuries ago when French was the \u201cuniversal language\u201d of Europe, no more than 25% of the population of France actually spoke French. Likewise, when French was the universal language of the elites, only about 5% of the population of Europe was educated. In short, when French was prestigious, relatively few spoke it. Today, 20% of 500 million educated Europeans speak French. (<strong>Mr. Girod should take note: from a historical perspective, the prestige and popularity of a language alone do not explain increases in native speakers<\/strong>).<\/p>\n<p><strong>11. <\/strong>According to some utterly incomprehensible reasoning, Mr. Girod cites, as evidence of the decline of French, the fact that New York\u2019s Metropolitan Opera refused Canadian singer Rufus Wainwright\u2019s French-language libretto, \u201cbecause he wouldn\u2019t translate it into English.\u201d The only thing this demonstrates is how stubbornly attached Wainwright is to French (yet he was raised in English). For that matter, many of today\u2019s renowned \u201cfrancophones\u201d express themselves in French even though they don\u2019t speak French as a mother tongue.In the last 25 years, the prestigious literary prize, the Goncourt, was attributed to five authors who did not speak French as a mother tongue, the last two winners being an American and an Afghan.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, in the United States, French films represent 50% of <em>all<\/em> foreign films viewed by Americans, and 30% of books translated. Half of the foreign language books translated by US publishing house were discovered and first translated by French publishers \u2013 the most famous case being Stieg Larsson\u2019s <em>Millennium <\/em>series.<\/p>\n<p><strong>12. <\/strong>The present budget of La Francophonie is about 7 times the six million euros Mr. Girod claims it is. Not to mention the budgets of two other valuable agencies of cultural diplomacy: <em>Agence universitaire francophone<\/em>, which links 750 universities worldwide, and <em>TV5-Monde<\/em>, the world\u2019s most widely distributed TV channel after CNN and MTV.<\/p>\n<p><strong>13.<\/strong> The 150 million dollars attributed to the British Council pale in comparison to the billion dollars that the French spend each year in cultural diplomacy through the <em>Alliances fran\u00e7aises<\/em>, the French Institutes (equivalent to the British council), the <em>Missions laiques fran\u00e7aises<\/em>, the <em>Alliance isra\u00e9lite universelle<\/em>, <em>France 24 <\/em>and dozens of institutions responsible for promoting film, books and other forms of art.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Girod evokes Darwinian theory, of all things, to conclude that the survival of the French language is at stake. It\u2019s a pretty silly conclusion to an article piling up false evidence to support a baseless assumption.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gary Girod piles up false evidence to support a silly and baseless assumption that the French language is on death\u2019s door. To top it all &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2397,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[57,53],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2385"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2385"}],"version-history":[{"count":27,"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2428,"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2385\/revisions\/2428"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nadeaubarlow.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}